AI Disruption

AI Disruption

Share this post

AI Disruption
AI Disruption
UIUC & Google Launch Search-R1: LLMs Now "Think While Searching" with Fluid Reasoning
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

UIUC & Google Launch Search-R1: LLMs Now "Think While Searching" with Fluid Reasoning

Search-R1: RL framework enabling LLMs to dynamically search & reason. Outperforms RAG by 41% with seamless search integration. Open-source.

Meng Li's avatar
Meng Li
Apr 21, 2025
∙ Paid
2

Share this post

AI Disruption
AI Disruption
UIUC & Google Launch Search-R1: LLMs Now "Think While Searching" with Fluid Reasoning
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

"AI Disruption" Publication 5900 Subscriptions 20% Discount Offer Link.


DeepSeek-R1 demonstrates the immense potential of reinforcement learning in enhancing model reasoning capabilities, particularly in settings where the model can learn to organize responses more rationally without requiring human-annotated reasoning processes.

However, such models lack real-time access to external data sources. When certain critical information is absent from the training corpus, the reasoning process often fails due to knowledge gaps.

Meanwhile, another research direction—Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)—attempts to address the above issue by incorporating external search engines. Existing RAG methods are primarily divided into two categories:

  • Prompting-based methods: These guide large models to invoke search engines directly within the prompt. While this approach requires no additional training, it has clear limitations: large models may lack the ability to interact effectively with search engines, such as knowing when to trigger a search or what keywords to use, often leading to unstable or redundant search behaviors.

  • Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)-based training methods: These involve constructing high-quality datasets to train models to learn rational search invocation strategies. Such methods offer greater adaptability but face scalability challenges: on one hand, building high-quality datasets that cover diverse reasoning paths is extremely costly; on the other hand, since search operations are non-differentiable, they cannot be directly incorporated into gradient descent optimization, hindering the effectiveness of end-to-end training.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Meng Li
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More