Decoding Data Engineering: A Timeline from Relational to Real-Time
How 50 years of data architecture shaped the modern stack.
"AI Disruption" Publication 6300 Subscriptions 20% Discount Offer Link.
👋 Welcome to My Guest Post on AI Disruption!
Hello, readers of AI Disruption! I'm Lorenzo, and I’m thrilled to share this deep dive into the fascinating history of data engineering with you. If you're someone who's passionate about the evolving landscape of technology, you're in for a treat.
For those who don’t know me, I’m Lorenzo – a writer and software developer passionate about data engineering, AI, and software development. My work explores how these fields are shaping the future, particularly in managing ever-growing amounts of data.
In this post, I’ll guide you through the evolution of data engineering, from relational databases to today’s real-time, lakehouse-driven platforms. This timeline highlights key ideas and tradeoffs that continue to shape modern systems, like batch vs. stream and warehouse vs. lake.
Meng Li has been a great inspiration to me, and I’m honored to contribute to AI Disruption. A huge thank you to Meng for this great opportunity!
I look forward to your thoughts and discussions, whether in the comments or over on my newsletter. Thanks for reading – let’s dive in!
I’ve spent the last few months diving deep into the guts of modern data platforms, ranging from Airflow to Kafka, then Postgres to Iceberg. The more I dug, the clearer it became: most of what we call “modern” is built on decades of quiet, compounding innovation.
This piece should be regarded as a way to zoom out. To trace the long arc of data engineering — not just the tools we use today, but how we got here. Because understanding the timeline helps make sense of the tradeoffs we still wrestle with: batch vs. stream, SQL vs. code, warehouse vs. lake.
Here’s what we will discover in this post:
A Personal Journey
Introduction
1970s: Relational Theory and Structured Data
1980s: OLTP, First ETL Flows, and Operational Databases
1990s: Warehousing, OLAP Cubes, and Dimensional Modeling
2000s: Dashboards, SQL Everywhere, and Web-Scale Complexity
2010s: Big Data, Cloud-Native Warehousing, and the Modern Stack
2020s: Real-Time, Data Contracts, and the Lakehouse Era
Conclusion
Introduction
If you zoom out and look at the last 50 years of software architecture, one thing becomes crystal clear: how we store, move, and transform data has always shaped what software can do. The evolution of data systems is less about flashy tools and more about answering a simple question:
How do we handle more data, faster, and with more flexibility than before?
We didn’t call it “data engineering” in the ‘70s. Back then, it was just “getting the database to work” — mostly batch jobs, rigid schemas, and a lot of manual plumbing. But as business needs grew and the internet wave arrived, the data layer cracked open. Suddenly we needed not just storage, but actual pipelines.
Not just queries, but real-time analytics. Not just tables, but streaming, unstructured events, and petabyte-scale systems that rarely slept.
Today, data engineering is a discipline of its own — sitting at the crossroads of systems design, distributed computing, and product velocity. And yet, most of its breakthroughs weren’t sudden inventions. They were responses to new bottlenecks, new expectations, and new kinds of scale.
This is a timeline — not just of tools, but of ideas. From the mathematical roots of relational algebra to modern lakehouses and stream-native platforms, it’s a story of how each generation redefined what “data infrastructure” means.
⚞️ 1970s: Relational Theory and the Birth of Structured Data
In 1970, Edgar F. Codd at IBM published a groundbreaking paper titled: "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks", which essentially introduced a revolutionary way to think about data: as collections of tuples (rows) and relations (tables).
The Main Ideas
Instead of working with data using low-level procedural code, Codd proposed that we should manipulate it using high-level declarative operations, like SQL’s SELECT. This allowed for clearer, more abstract interactions with data, making it easier for people to work with large datasets without worrying about the underlying mechanics.
Early Implementations: IBM’s System R and UC Berkeley’s Ingres were among the first systems built to test and implement relational concepts.
Before relational databases, data was often stored in flat files or hierarchical models like IBM’s IMS, which didn’t offer much flexibility. The relational model changed this by introducing schema enforcement (defining the structure of data), ACID guarantees (ensuring reliable, consistent transactions), and data independence (allowing data to be managed independently from the applications using it).
However, there were challenges. Early relational systems faced performance issues, struggled with scalability, and lacked efficient indexing strategies, making them slower than some existing alternatives. These problems were largely addressed over time with advances in indexing and query optimization.
Impact: The relational model formalized the idea that data isn't just a collection of raw values but something that can be described, structured, and manipulated with rules. It laid the foundation for the development of SQL and many of the database languages we use today. This was a shift that redefined how people approached data, turning it into a structured, manageable asset that could be easily queried and manipulated.
🗂️ 1980s: OLTP, Early ETL, and the Rise of Operational Data Systems
As the whole world moved into the 1980s, relational databases crossed the bridge from academic experiments to full-blown commercial products. Oracle launched its first commercial RDBMS in 1979, followed by heavyweights like IBM’s DB2, Informix, and Sybase throughout the decade. Suddenly, businesses had access to structured, transactional data at a scale that had never been possible before.
By the late 1980s, it was clear: transactional systems optimized for writes couldn't meet the analytical demands of read-heavy workloads — prompting the birth of ETL, secondary storage, and the first true data warehouses.
The core concept: This era was dominated by OLTP — Online Transaction Processing — systems designed to handle high volumes of small, fast operations: inserting a bank transaction, updating a customer record, processing an inventory adjustment.
The focus wasn’t on analysis — it was on speed, consistency, and reliability for day-to-day business operations.
Transactional integrity (ACID properties) became the gold standard. Applications could trust that every payment, shipment, and record update would be handled cleanly, or not at all.
Growing Pains
As companies accumulated more operational data, a new challenge emerged:
How do you analyze millions of transactions without slowing down the system responsible for running the business?
The first solution was pragmatic but messy: copy the data.
Engineers wrote custom ETL scripts — often scheduled as overnight batch jobs — that extracted data from production systems, transformed it into formats suitable for reporting, and loaded it into separate, secondary databases.
At this stage, ETL was still artisanal: shell scripts, cron jobs, hand-coded transformations.
Early Ecosystem Formation:
Recognizing the complexity of moving and reshaping data, early vendors stepped in:
Informatica (founded 1993, roots in late '80s thinking) and IBM DataStage began automating parts of the ETL process.
SAS helped enterprises run complex statistical analyses once data had been centralized.
Teradata built pioneering MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) database systems, distributing queries across many nodes to handle growing data volumes.
Even though ETL tools were primitive by today’s standards, this era laid the foundation for what would later become enterprise-scale data integration pipelines.
The Birth of the Data Warehouse Concept
In 1988, Bill Inmon formally coined the term data warehouse, describing it as:
A subject-oriented, integrated, time-variant, and non-volatile collection of data in support of decision making.
Inmon’s definition crystallized what engineers had been piecing together informally:
Subject-oriented: Focused on key business entities (customers, products, transactions).
Integrated: Consolidated from multiple sources, cleaned and reconciled.
Time-variant: Keeping historical snapshots, not just current states.
Non-volatile: Once stored, data was stable and not frequently updated.
This marked a philosophical split: OLTP systems were for operational work; data warehouses were for analytical thinking. Two distinct types of databases, two different goals.
Lasting Impact:
The 1980s created the first real need to separate data for operations from data for insights — a tension that would drive major architectural innovations for the next 40 years.
It also planted the seeds for a new specialization within IT: people whose sole job was moving, transforming, and modeling data — the early data engineers.
📈 1990s: Warehousing, OLAP Cubes, and Dimensional Modeling
The 1990s marked a turning point in the evolution of data systems. As businesses increasingly relied on data to make decisions, data warehouses became the central pillar of corporate analytics. What started as experimental technology in the ‘80s quickly matured into mission-critical infrastructure.
Vendors like Oracle, Teradata, and IBM DB2 dominated the landscape, building powerful relational databases specifically designed for large-scale analytical workloads. These systems allowed organizations to store vast amounts of historical data and run complex queries to extract insights that would drive strategic decisions.
The Birth of Data Warehousing Philosophy
The concept of data warehousing was evolving, but so too was the architecture behind it.This concept is better know as the Kimball vs. Inmon debate — one of the most influential discussions in the history of data engineering. Ralph Kimball, a staunch advocate for dimensional modeling, argued that simplicity was the key.
His approach favored building star schemas, where data was structured into fact tables and dimension tables that were optimized for reporting and querying. The goal was to enable end-users, even those with minimal technical expertise, to easily access and analyze data without getting bogged down by complex structures.
Bill Inmon, the father of the “enterprise data warehouse,” took a different stance. He emphasized normalization and building an enterprise-wide, centralized data model that could serve as a single source of truth for the entire organization.
This model was designed to be more rigid, with a focus on data integrity and consistency across the company, but it often required additional work to break down data for ad-hoc analysis.
OLAP Cubes: Empowering Users with Self-Service Analytics
Around the same time, OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) technology took off. OLAP cubes revolutionized the way users interacted with data. Tools like Business Objects, Cognos, and MicroStrategy allowed users to access pre-aggregated data from OLAP cubes, providing a fast and intuitive interface for querying multidimensional data.
Instead of writing SQL queries, users could drag and drop dimensions and measures to explore the data in real-time — a process that democratized analytics and made it accessible to business users who didn’t have a background in data science.
These OLAP systems allowed organizations to get answers to critical questions quickly. For example, a marketing team could examine sales data by region, time, and product category, gaining insights into performance trends without waiting for the IT team to run complex reports.
But the cubes came with their own set of challenges. They required significant upfront work to pre-aggregate the data, and keeping them up-to-date with real-time data proved difficult.
The Rise of ETL Tools and Integration
With the explosion of data across various business systems — from CRM platforms like Salesforce to ERPs like SAP — the need for more sophisticated ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes became more apparent. Custom-built scripts were no longer sufficient for enterprises dealing with large amounts of data. This led to the rise of dedicated ETL tools such as Informatica, DataStage, and SAS. These tools introduced graphical user interfaces (GUIs), making it easier to design and schedule data pipelines. They allowed companies to integrate data from various systems, transforming it into the correct format for loading into data warehouses.
The evolution of ETL platforms also addressed the challenge of data consistency. Companies began standardizing the way data was moved across systems, with connectors to common enterprise systems like ERP and CRM platforms, making it easier to maintain a reliable flow of data from operational systems into analytical environments.
Metadata Repositories and Slowly Changing Dimensions
As data grew in complexity, organizations needed better ways to understand and manage it. This led to the rise of metadata repositories — centralized systems that tracked the data’s lineage, ensuring that data could be traced from its origin to its final destination.
Metadata became an essential tool for ensuring data quality and consistency, particularly as organizations began dealing with vast amounts of data spread across different departments and systems.
At the same time, the need for tracking historical changes in data led to the adoption of Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCDs). This technique allowed businesses to capture changes over time — for example, tracking how a customer’s address or status changed while maintaining historical records.
Managing SCDs effectively became crucial for accurate reporting, especially in industries like retail and finance, where data could change frequently.
Batch Processing and the Age of Stale Data
Despite all these advancements, the BI stack was still dominated by batch processing. ETL jobs typically ran overnight, and data was refreshed only during specific windows — often overnight or on weekends.
As a result, dashboards and reports were often stale, meaning that decision-makers didn’t always have access to the latest information. For many businesses, this wasn’t an issue. The slow, batch-driven nature of the pipelines fit the needs of companies that didn’t rely on real-time insights.
But as companies became more competitive and data-driven, the limitations of batch processing became clear. Decisions based on stale data could result in missed opportunities or, worse, incorrect conclusions. Despite this, the tools of the 1990s laid the foundation for what would come next — a more real-time and flexible approach to data engineering.
Legacy and Impact
The 1990s solidified the idea that data warehouses weren’t just for storing data — they were about enabling decision-making. The OLAP systems, ETL processes, and metadata management techniques introduced during this decade continue to shape the foundations of modern data engineering.
Even as the tools evolved, the core principles of data warehousing — centralizing data, ensuring consistency, and providing insights through querying — became a standard that many organizations still follow today. The batch-oriented workflows, however, were slowly giving way to the need for more flexible, real-time systems — a transition that would take center stage in the next decade.
🤖The 2000s: From SQL Ubiquity to the Rise of Web-Scale Systems
As the 21st century unfolded, the web experienced an unprecedented explosion. The rise of web applications, social media platforms, and user-generated content created a new kind of data — larger, messier, and more unstructured than anything that had come before.
Data was no longer simply coming from enterprise applications but was now streaming from millions of users interacting with platforms on a global scale. Companies were suddenly dealing with petabytes of data, much of it in unstructured formats like logs, clickstreams, and social media posts.
The Rise of the BI Layer
In the face of this explosion of data, business intelligence (BI) took center stage. The 2000s saw the proliferation of reporting portals, KPI dashboards, and the eternal favorite — Excel exports. These tools became essential for decision-makers to make sense of vast amounts of data.
Business users increasingly demanded easy-to-read, real-time insights into operations, sales, and customer behavior, often using web-based dashboards that integrated data from a wide array of internal systems.
SQL, which had long been the foundation of relational databases, continued to dominate during this period. By now, it was the de facto standard language for querying data across a variety of systems. Even as new data technologies emerged, SQL was the glue that held it all together. Whether the data was structured or semi-structured, SQL was the common language for extracting and manipulating it.
The Growing Complexity of ETL
As companies collected more and more data, the complexity of ETL workflows escalated. It was no longer enough to simply extract, transform, and load data; now there were dependencies to track, schemas to evolve, and data quality checks to monitor. Much of this was handled manually, often through a patchwork of scripts that were brittle, poorly documented, and prone to failure when something inevitably broke.
The data engineer’s job was mostly invisible, working behind the scenes to ensure that data pipelines kept running smoothly. Yet, when something went wrong, the system would often grind to a halt, and the data engineer would become the first person called to fix the issue — often under a tight deadline.
New Approaches to Performance
In response to the growing demands for faster analytics, columnar storage systems emerged. Tools like Vertica and InfoBright leveraged columnar storage to drastically speed up analytical queries.
Unlike traditional row-based storage, which was optimized for transactional systems, columnar storage allowed for faster read operations, making it ideal for analytical workloads.
Simultaneously, the idea of Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) gained traction. Systems like Teradata experimented with distributed architectures that allowed for better scalability and performance. By splitting up data across multiple nodes and processing it in parallel, these systems were able to handle web-scale data far more efficiently than traditional systems.
A Growing Need for Better Data Engineering Practices
Yet despite these innovations, data engineering was still largely a sub-function of the IT department. The processes and tools that supported the growing volume of data were still undocumented, brittle, and hidden from the business.
Only when something broke did the complexity of data pipelines become visible to the broader organization. This lack of visibility and fragility created friction between the data engineers and business users, who were increasingly relying on data to drive decisions.
📀 2010s: Big Data, Cloud-Native Warehousing, and the Modern Stack
By the 2010s, everything changed. The term Big Data became synonymous with the incredible scale at which companies were now operating. The emergence of frameworks like MapReduce and its later evolution into Hadoop transformed how we processed and stored large volumes of data. Google’s 2004 MapReduce paper inspired the development of the Hadoop ecosystem, which included tools like Hive (for SQL-like querying), Pig (for data flow scripting), and HBase (for distributed storage).
The Shift to Real-Time: Spark and Kafka
But Hadoop’s batch processing nature had limitations. Enter Apache Spark, which replaced MapReduce with in-memory execution and DAG-based optimizations. Spark made it possible to process data much faster and in real time, and it quickly became the go-to platform for Big Data processing.
Alongside this, Kafka was introduced as a durable pub/sub log for event-driven pipelines, allowing for near-instantaneous processing of data as it was generated. With Kafka, companies could stream data in real time, turning what was once batch-oriented work into continuous flows of data — setting the stage for the real-time analytics that would come to define the next decade.
Cloud-Native Warehousing and the Rise of the Data Lake
The 2010s also marked the explosion of cloud computing. Cloud providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud offered storage (e.g., S3, GCS) and compute (e.g., EC2) that could scale elastically, allowing businesses to spin up computing resources without worrying about hardware management.
Cloud-native data warehousing systems like Redshift (2012), BigQuery, and Snowflake completely changed the game. These systems took advantage of cloud scalability and allowed organizations to store vast amounts of data with virtually no upfront infrastructure costs. They provided elastic performance, enabling businesses to scale compute and storage resources up or down as needed.
The introduction of data lakes — systems that decoupled storage from compute — further shifted the way companies approached analytics. Data could now be stored in its raw form, and compute resources could be brought in as needed for processing.
The Emergence of the Modern Data Stack
The tools used for analytics engineering also matured in this decade. dbt (2016) became the go-to tool for transforming raw data in the warehouse into clean, modeled data. It enabled engineers to write modular, testable, and version-controlled SQL, turning analytics into a well-structured software development process.
Meanwhile, Airflow (2015) revolutionized data orchestration. With its Python-based Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) orchestration model, Airflow allowed teams to automate their ETL pipelines, improving reliability and visibility. What had once been a brittle, opaque process now became more streamlined and transparent.
🧠 2020s: Real-Time, Data Contracts, and the Lakehouse Era
The 2020s ushered in an era of real-time data engineering. Companies began embracing streaming-first designs, and platforms like Kafka, Flink, and Spark Structured Streaming became integral to building event-driven architectures. The focus shifted toward handling data as it was created, processing it continuously, and making it available in real-time for analytics and decision-making.
The rise of the lakehouse architecture — exemplified by tools like Databricks’ Delta Lake, Apache Iceberg, and Apache Hudi — combined the scalability of data lakes with the ACID transaction capabilities of data warehouses. Lakehouses provided a unified interface for both batch and streaming data, allowing organizations to handle massive volumes of data with transaction guarantees and fast query speeds.
At the same time, reverse ETL tools like Census and Hightouch emerged, allowing companies to take data from their data warehouse and push it into operational systems like CRMs, marketing tools, and customer service platforms. This brought operational analytics to the forefront, enabling businesses to make data-driven decisions not just in analytics, but directly in the tools that frontline employees use every day.
New orchestration paradigms like Dagster and improvements in Airflow 2.x began to redefine how workflows were managed, enabling more efficient and reliable data pipelines. Data contracts — formal agreements that define the structure and expectations of data between systems — became a best practice, ensuring that the data flowing through pipelines met the required standards.
The 2020s also saw the intersection of data engineering and machine learning. Feature stores, vector databases, and online/offline parity allowed organizations to better serve the needs of ML models while ensuring that data was always in the right format and available when needed.
🚀Conclusion: Evolving at the Speed of Data
What started as a fragmented collection of tools for managing structured data has now evolved into a complex, dynamic ecosystem that powers real-time analytics, operational decision-making, and even machine learning workflows. From the rigid, batch-based systems of the 1980s to the flexible, cloud-native, event-driven architectures of the 2020s, data engineering has become a core part of business infrastructure.
Today, data engineers are hybrid professionals — part infrastructure architect, part backend developer, part reliability engineer, and increasingly domain experts in the data they work with. The journey from Codd’s relational model to cloud-native lakehouses reflects a profound shift in how businesses approach their most valuable resource: data.
And as the field continues to evolve — with trends like data mesh, semantic layers, and foundation models — the role of the data engineer will only grow in importance. Data engineering is no longer about shuffling CSVs; it’s about building systems that can scale with the speed of the business, enabling insights, and supporting the infrastructure that drives the modern data-driven world.
 | A guest post by
|
 | A guest post by
|